iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1609

General information and performance details for Vivo 1609 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Vivo 1609

Model Variants: vivo 1609

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 962

Average Mem Mark: 4,879

Average Disk Mark: 9,376

Average 2D Mark: 7,887

Average 3D Mark: 5,618

Average CPU Mark (V3): 5,516*

Average PassMark Rating
2,068

Rank: 3603
Samples: 2

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Oct 12 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 28th of March 2025 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Xiaomi TB-9707F
 7,109
Xiaomi 24095PCADG
 6,042
Samsung SC-53E
 5,811
Samsung SM-A166W
 4,754
Realme RMX3940
 4,351
HONOR ALT-LX2
 3,258
Realme RMX3941
 2,796
SKYEGG K15_EEA
 2,784
HMD Global HMD Pulse
 1,566
Vivo 1609
 962
PassMark Software © 2025


Last 2 Baselines for Vivo 1609
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL812587 - Oct 12 2020 [OLD V3]
2068
BL812586 - Oct 12 2020 [OLD V3]
2068
PassMark Software © 2025