iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

OSCAL Pad 10

General information and performance details for OSCAL Pad 10 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
OSCAL Pad 10

CPU Type: T606

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: 7580.6 MB

Average CPU Mark: 2,895

Average Mem Mark: 11,968

Average Disk Mark: 0

Average 2D Mark: 14,245

Average 3D Mark: 10,018

Average PassMark Rating
6,092

Rank: 1778
Samples: 2

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Apr 15 2023

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 28th of March 2025 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Xiaomi TB-9707F
7,109
Xiaomi 24095PCADG
6,042
Samsung SC-53E
5,811
Samsung SM-A166W
4,754
Realme RMX3940
4,351
HONOR ALT-LX2
3,258
OSCAL Pad 10
2,895
Realme RMX3941
2,796
SKYEGG K15_EEA
2,784
HMD Global HMD Pulse
1,566


Last 2 Baselines for OSCAL Pad 10
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL8068798 - Sep 12 2023
6205
BL8060628 - Apr 15 2023
5979