iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Google X96Q_Max_Pro

General information and performance details for Google X96Q_Max_Pro can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Google X96Q_Max_Pro

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 320

Average Mem Mark: 2,992

Average Disk Mark: 21,403

Average 2D Mark: 3,640

Average 3D Mark: 4,748

Average CPU Mark (V3): 1,833*

Average PassMark Rating
753

Rank: NA
Samples: 1

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Nov 19 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 16th of April 2025 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Xiaomi 25010PN30G
 13,178
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
 12,279
Reeder S71
 8,163
Nothing A059P
 6,786
Huawei TGR-W09
 5,158
Wingtech TMRV5GTB
 4,091
DOOGEE Fire 6
 2,913
Welcome I25 ULTRA
 1,982
KonnectONE m2303
 833
Google X96Q_Max_Pro
 320
PassMark Software © 2025


Last 1 Baselines for Google X96Q_Max_Pro
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL816649 - Nov 19 2020 [OLD V3]
753
PassMark Software © 2025