iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Amlogic Ccosycost.10

General information and performance details for Amlogic Ccosycost.10 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Amlogic Ccosycost.10

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 278

Average Mem Mark: 3,372

Average Disk Mark: 19,022

Average 2D Mark: 3,517

Average 3D Mark: 5,243

Average CPU Mark (V3): 1,592*

Average PassMark Rating
663

Rank: NA
Samples: 1

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Jul 16 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 16th of April 2025 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Xiaomi 25010PN30G
 13,178
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
 12,279
Reeder S71
 8,163
Nothing A059P
 6,786
Huawei TGR-W09
 5,158
Wingtech TMRV5GTB
 4,091
DOOGEE Fire 6
 2,913
Welcome I25 ULTRA
 1,982
KonnectONE m2303
 833
Amlogic Ccosycost.10
 278
PassMark Software © 2025


Last 1 Baselines for Amlogic Ccosycost.10
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL804511 - Jul 16 2020 [OLD V3]
663
PassMark Software © 2025